Friday, April 7, 2006

Here's the Story

Bautista found not quilty

By Daniel Mathewson,

asst. to editor


ALTUS - A long and terrible year has ended for Melinda Bautista, who was found not guilty by a Jackson County jury Tuesday of murdering 10-month-old Madilyne Wentz in April 2005.

It's a great day for Altus, and the system works, said Altus attorney Glen Dresback shortly after the verdict was read.

The jury of six men and six women deliberated less than an hour Tuesday afternoon following closing arguments in the trial, which began March 20 with a grueling 3 1/2 day voir dire process and stretched on for another eight days of exhausting and emotional testimony.

Clearly, the jury paid close attention to the evidence and the judge was very fair, said attorney Stephen Jones, who had the jury as well as Associate District Judge David Barnett on the edges of their seats during his eloquent wrap-up of the medical records and testimony presented and a scathing rebuke of agents of the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation who had decided that Melinda Bautista was guilty of shaking Madilyne on April 12, 2005, out of frustration and because she had not taken her antidepressant medicine that day.

Jones called the actions of agents Peter Unruh and Melissa Gann, during a two hour videotaped interview April 13, 2005, at the Altus Police Department, shameful, immoral and unprofessional ... an affront to the Bill of Rights.

Assistant District Attorney Stephen Booker laid out the state's closing argument following a reading of the jury instructions by Barnett shortly after 1 p.m.

Booker reviewed the testimony given by witnesses called by the state - from family members of the deceased infant, medical personnel of the Jackson County EMS and Jackson County Memorial Hospital, and medical professionals the state had called in to support the prosecution's contention that Madilyne had died due to abusive head trauma that occurred immediately prior to Bautista's 9-11 call at 4:33 p.m. that Tuesday, two days before the child died at St. Francis Hospital in Tulsa.

She (Bautista) was gonna call 9-11, get Madi Wentz some help and hope she wouldn't die, Booker said to the jury. She knew she had gone too far.

In regard to the OSBI interview, Booker told the jury that Bautista admitted shaking the child, because she did it.

Jones targeted the agents' interrogation of Bautista, saying, They set out to make her confess. ... What they succeeded in making Mrs. Bautista feel is that she had done something wrong.

He blasted testimony given by the state's medical witnesses and dissected the report signed by Andrew Sibley, M.D., the man who performed the autopsy on Madilyne. On the witness stand March 29, Sibley admitted that he had been the subject of investigation in October 2000 for inappropriate conduct in the autopsy room of his former employer in Pima County, Ariz., and said that his information about Bautista's confession to the crime came in a telephone call from a deputy with the Jackson County Sheriff's Department.

Outside the courthouse following the verdict Tuesday afternoon, Jones lauded the professionalism of the District Attorney's Office and law enforcement personnel in Altus and Jackson County, but said, I think the OSBI interview was unfortunate and did not help the prosecution's case.

Jones who in September 2005 successfully defended a client in Alva who had been charged with murder in the shaking death of an 11-month-old son of his girlfriend, said Tuesday, I'm glad to see that people are moving away from the idea you can shake a baby to death without an impact.

The medical evidence in Bautista's case, Jones said, was with us.

Wednesday, April 5, 2006

Trial Day 12 - Altus day 17ish

We went to court today and the judge immediately excused the jury until 1:00 so the lawyers could talk about jury instructions since they both rested yesterday. We figured the state would call a rebuttal witness and we prepared for one, but when we got to court today, they didn't. So it was ready for closing arguments and to go to the jury after that.

So after lunch the lawyers gave their closing statements. The DA basically replayed the testimony that had been given but in kind of a bad and twisted kind of way. Say you're working on a puzzle but you discover some of the pieces are missing so you look and you find some random pieces under the couch and in a junk drawer and you cram them in and smash them in and hope they fit and they don't - his version was a lot like that. Or imagine your 4 year old brings you a lovely picture of a flower and asks you, "How do you like my horsey, mommy?" It was totally not accurate and I found myself sitting there thinking, "Jesus, if you can't even take good notes over a 12 day period, how the hell can you expect to try a murder case?" Then Stephen gave his closing. Gracious and eloquent is what his was. And more importantly, accurate. The jury was sent out to deliberate at 4:45 p.m. and we headed back to the hotel to wait it out. At 5:38 p.m. we got a call that said they had a verdict so we loaded up into his car and headed back to the Jackson County Courthouse. We arrived and everyone was assembled and the courtroom was packed. The judge spoke briefly and had the jury brought in. The judge asked them if they had a verdict and they said they did. The foreman handed the form to the court clerk, who has been so wonderful and nice to us this whole time, and she begins to read it. She states the name of the county and the case style and the case number, then she starts to read the body of the verdict. Her voice cracked and waivered part way through and I became sick to my stomach. Why was her voice sounding like that? Then I heard the words "not guilty" and there was a huge explosion of jubilation in the courtroom behind me and Melinda (the accused) broke down and we all cried. The judge had some more to say so we had to sit and wait to rejoice for a few more minutes. The family of the deceased child was allowed to leave first. Then we were. She is from a very big Hispanic Catholic family and they came from all over to support her. They were all of course hugging her and us and they were so grateful for what had been done for her. Melinda was accused of shaking a baby in her care at her daycare and it died. It died from no oxygen because it aspirated. She was initially arrested in April of last year and spent two months in jail and then when she was able to get out on bond she had to live away from her family in an apartment because DHS wouldn't allow her to live near her 18 month old because she might shake it, too. So for a year this woman hasn't been with her family and has not been able to bond with her baby but for an hour a week supervised at DHS. Tonight she got to go home and sleep in her bed and hold her baby without the suspicious eyes of a case worker and the thought of life in prison hanging over her head.

After the trial was over, her family invited us out to the house for dinner so Jill and I donned our "Property of SJ" shirts and we went. They were so nice to us and so gracious and grateful. Jill and I felt like we had a bunch of new aunts and uncles when we left. Mr. Jones was very appreciateive of the hard work we put in and he was happy with the out come of course. I thought about the long nights and the working through being sick and not being home for weeks, and I thought how small all that is compared to what this woman has gone through for the last year. She missed a year of bonding with her baby and sleeping in her own bed, not knowing if she would spend the rest of her life in prison, having the town talk about her and speculate. When we were at her home and I looked over and saw her sitting on her couch with her baby girl on her lap, it brought tears to my eyes because all we went through was worth that one moment. Jill and I talked about how believing in her made us work that much harder for her and made it all so worth it. This is why I love my job.

It's kind of surreal, really. Before the trial started, I had only physically met Melinda maybe twice. But I knew her life story and I had worked on her stuff so much that I felt like I knew her. When the trial began, I sat next to her there on the bench and held her hand and hugged her through the hard parts and cried for her and her family. I sat there and watched people try to bully her and lie about her and try to convince 12 strangers from her community that they should believe them. I left tonight feeling connected to her and her family and thinking that even though our paths may never have the chance to cross again, I know I will think of her and this day often and fondly.

We came back to the hotel room and made phone calls to spouses and friends back at the office. I told Jill we couldn't not celebrate and we needed to have at least one beer, so we went to the hotel bar and sat at a table by the wall and we very quietly celebrated the winning of our first murder trial together. I decided that we need to start a tradtion at our office that we have a party every time we win a case or settle one...

Something that was funny was one of Melinda's friends that's been there watching asked me today if I ever watched Boston Legal because Stephen reminded her of that. I told you my job was like Boston Legal.

Monday, April 3, 2006

Week 3

Today marks the beginning of week 3 here in the big town. We finished up with our witnesses today. The other side has a rebuttal witness tomorrow and then hopefully it will be closing arguments and jury deliberation. I got booted from my hotel room for some jacked up reason or another - some bs about they're booked up and needed the room or some crap. So I'm bunking with Jill tonight and all our stuff is in one room along with all our makeshift office stuff. I got some pics I'll post when I get home. Kind of funny really when you look around at the craziness. Anyway - gotta go type SJ's thoughts. Interesting job I have...